Skill-biased tech change in parenting
27/02/2012 § 3 Comments
I’ve been reading the literature on skill-biased technological change. Essentially, technology is a substitute for low-skill work and a complement to skilled work. If you can write it down as a formal process, then a machine can probably do it better and faster than a human.
What about parenting? A lot of parenting is low-skill and repetitive. How many times have I told them to put their dirty socks in the hamper? How many peanut-butter-and-jam sandwiches have I made? I dream of something like this:
> for (years in 3:length(years_at_home))
> if (dirty_socks > 2){instruction <- 1}
> if(dirty_socks > 4){nagging <- 1}
Offsetting Behaviour wants to follow Becker, and is wondering about professionals’ domestic production activities and NZ’s minimum wage. So much of parenting, though, is context-specific. That’s the value of a nanny over a cleaner: the nanny can respond to the changing contexts and have a menu of contingent responses.
I was recently reading about Unequal Childhoods by Annette Lareau. She identifies two broad approaches to parenting, and points out that the middle-class approach better prepares children to have an active voice in adulthood. They are better prepared to make demands on institutions because families make discussion and negotiation a central feature of family life.
Modern technology — ICT — is focused on communication. So, shouldn’t it make middle-class parenting easier and more efficient (and cheaper) to produce?
I’m not sure how much ICT really helps. Parenting is a collection of activities, skilled and unskilled: cleaning, cooking, discussing, taxi-ing, playing, etc. For a lot of the low-skill work, the labour-saving devices were all invented decades ago. The remaining low-skill tasks, such as driving or making sandwiches, still require human work. For the skilled work — homework help, heartfelt discussions about who said what to whom — technology has a minor role. I don’t have to drive my kid to the library, but I still need to spend time explaining how to get information out of an (on-line) encyclopedia.
One place technology seems to be substituting for parental effort is games. I don’t have to play checkers/draughts or battleship with my kids; the machine will do it for me. Sometimes this is useful, but sometimes I actually do want to play.
I did have a good experience with technology this weekend. My kids take voice lessons, and I sometimes help them with the warm-ups. The problem is that I’m not usually around in the peak homework hours, and after tea is getting a bit late. I used music-writing software (Sibelius) to write out one of the exercises, and the software has a play-back feature. Now, the computer can ‘comp’ them for their warm-ups. The technology allows me to ‘amplify’ my skills and the kids get better practice time. Bingo — more efficient parenting.
Now, about those socks…
I outsource as much parenting as I’m currently comfortable with via daycare on campus. A live-in nanny would be nice, but really would require a larger house than we’re able to afford. But there are plenty of outsourceable tasks that are less relationship-specific than parenting.
What I’d want to outsource is all the cleaning, laundry, and other tedious low-skill time-intensive activities that could be being done at the house while we’re away. We already outsource the gardening; we’ve started outsourcing large parts of pool maintenance.
Outsourcing is an option, of course. But with the remaining tasks, how much has modern technology made them more efficient? Is parenting one of these services that doesn’t have much use for ICT? I guess cellphones have made just-in-time taxi-ing more practical. What else?
ICT & tech does less to affect parenting directly and more to free up time for fun stuff with kids. The Magic Washing Machine makes the point beautifully.
http://offsettingbehaviour.blogspot.co.nz/2011/04/magic-washing-machine.html